By Adam Chen
(June 25, 2025)It's been a hectic few months! You may have seen our commentary, you may not, but it was great to see some updates in the guidelines for researchers working in emotionally demanding research! The Sprint Project team have added two additional guides - one regarding individual research wellbeing and another for conference organisers and delegates.
Alongside this, we were very fortunate to have Dr Georgia Bird come along and host a workshop focusing on EDR and highlighting the potential support and areas that need addressing. Dr Bird guided us through some reflective activities in understanding how our research is demanding, how we can best support ourselves and talked us through the best practices guidelines.
There's still a fair bit of work to be done around this area, but it is a great starting point. I'm very pleased to see what has been developed and look forward to seeing what else comes from this in the future.
By SRN Midlands
(June 09, 2025)This commentary critically engages with Quinton et al.’s (2025) article, "Best practices for supporting researchers’ mental health in emotionally demanding research across academic and non-academic contexts." The original article offers a valuable framework to address the mental health toll of emotionally demanding research (EDR), emphasizing psychological culture, actionable practices, and boundary-setting. While these recommendations are both timely and important, this commentary argues that their practical implementation may be limited without deeper structural reform. It highlights the need for more robust engagement with institutional, cultural, and policy-level barriers that shape researchers’ mental health outcomes. Furthermore, it underscores the risks of over-relying on individual resilience in contexts marked by resource inequity and precarity. The commentary calls for clearer accountability mechanisms and a stronger whole-systems approach to ensure that researcher well-being is treated not as a personal responsibility, but as a collective, institutional imperative.
Cite as: Chen, AHC. and Ingham, M. (2025) 'Commentary on Quinton et al. (2025): A Step Towards a Framework for Supporting Researchers in Emotionally Demanding Research', 09 June. Available at: blog.srnmidlands.comBy Henna Chumber
(February 05, 2025)Mental health care is often shaped by systemic biases, gaps in cultural understanding, and the unintended consequences of professional disengagement. As a PhD researcher (and former mental health support worker of four years) exploring malignant alienation, the phenomenon where service-users feel abandoned or dehumanized by their care providers, I have seen how certain symptoms can result in differential treatment. My research seeks to understand why these disparities exist and how we can foster a more compassionate, equitable system.
In parallel, my business, ConnectedCulture, aims to bridge the gap in culturally competent mental health care. We recognize that individuals from diverse backgrounds often struggle to find therapists who understand their lived experiences. By providing access to culturally sensitive therapists and advocating for systemic change, we strive to create a model of care that acknowledges and respects cultural nuances.
The Sensitive Research Network (SRN) plays a crucial role in supporting research that tackles challenging, underrepresented issues. The themes of sensitivity in research, whether discussing marginalization, inequity, or overlooked patient experiences, resonate deeply with both my academic and business pursuits. SRN’s commitment to fostering inclusive research aligns with my goal of ensuring that mental health care is not only clinically effective but also ethically sound and socially just.
By collaborating with networks like SRN, we can push for policy changes that recognize the importance of cultural sensitivity and relational care in mental health treatment. The intersection of research and practice is vital, evidence-based insights must translate into real-world solutions that benefit those most affected by systemic shortcomings.
Through my work, I hope to contribute to a mental health landscape where no patient feels alienated or unheard, where care is responsive to both psychological and cultural dimensions, and where mental health professionals are equipped to engage with diverse experiences without bias.
If you are interested in these discussions or would like to collaborate, I invite you to connect with me through SRN or ConnectedCulture. Let’s work together to build a more inclusive, compassionate mental health systems.
